Country singers Jelly Roll and Bunnie Xo have officially ended their marriage through a judicial decree on July 17, according to court documents obtained by Us Weekly on July 20.

A key aspect of their divorce is its swift conclusion, which has led experts like Rachael Bennett to speculate on how long the couple had planned their separation. A certified family law specialist and senior attorney at Sullivan Law & Associates, who breaks down the case on Legally Us, notes that Tennessee's 60-day cooling-off period makes it highly unlikely that they reached a comprehensive agreement on such significant financial matters within those two months. This timeline implies that discussions around dividing their properties and other aspects of their marital estate began much earlier.

Bennett further explains that given the timing of their decision-making process, it’s possible the couple prepared their agreements well ahead of time with the assistance of lawyers. This assertion aligns with her belief that spouses often take proactive steps when anticipating a separation. The terms of the agreement include a confidential division of their personal belongings, vehicles, aircraft, intellectual property rights, among other items.

The specifics of the settlement concerning spousal support remain private, though both parties agreed to waive their right to seek additional compensation from each other beyond the lump-sum equitable distribution provided to Bunnie Xo. According to Bennett, this decision represents a strategic choice rather than an entirely altruistic gesture. It carries certain risk for both partners, especially considering the potential disparity between the amount agreed upon now versus what might be decided by a court.

Through public statements, both artists have confirmed their commitment to maintaining a friendly relationship despite their divorce. Their assertions echo sentiments expressed by Bennett herself. When asked if this arrangement holds future implications, she noted the significance of legally separating property while keeping alimony settlements outside of formal proceedings could set precedents for similar cases going forward.